Телеком в России 1992-2003

home | о проекте | контакты | поиск  
Новости
Рейтинги
Компании
Who is ...
Databases
Статьи
Архив
 

Telegeography Statistic 

I.Telephony

International Traffic and Main Line Growth

International Traffic and Main Line Growth

Notes: Data include outbound international traffic on public networks only, VoIP call volumes are excluded. Projections assume 12 percent traffic growth, 6 percent main line growth, and 30 percent mobile subscriber growth annually.

Source: TeleGeography research and ITU

  Millions of Worldwide Subscribers
  Total International Traffic Fixed Main Lines Cellular Subscribers Fixed & Mobile Subscribers
1991
38.0
547.0
16.2
563.2
1992
43.2
576.0
23.2
599.2
1993
48.3
605.0
34.2
639.2
1994
54.6
647.0
55.2
702.2
1995
61.6
692.0
89.0
781.0
1996
71.7
743.0
142.0
885.0
1997
82.5
787.4
214.9
1002.3
1998
93.0
845.0
318.0
1163.0
1999
109.2
900.0
485.0
1385.0
2000
132.7
985.0
740.0
1725.0

Projected:
2001
155.3
1054.0
962.0
2016.0
2002
181.7
1127.7
1250.6
2378.3
2003
212.5
1207.0
1625.8
2832.4
2004
248.7
1291.1
2113.5
3404.6
 
CAGR 1991-2000
0.15
0.07
0.5
0.1
CAGR 2000-2004
0.17
0.07
0.3
0.2
Growth Assumption
0.17
0.07
0.3

Top 10 International Carriers

 

Rank

Company Origin Country Outgoing Traffic
(millions of minutes)
2001 Revenue
(US$ billions)
2001 2000 Change ‘00-’01 Total Int’l Service
1. AT&T Corp. United States 12,006.8 9,680.1 24.0% 52.6 4.6
2. WorldCom United States 11,454.7 12,399.5 -7.6% 35.2 1.7
3. Sprint United States 5,384.4 3,922.8 37.3% 26.1 0.8
4. Deutsche Telekom Germany 5,025.1 4,525.0 11.1% 43.3 0.7
5. France Telecom France 4,592.0 4,393.0 4.5% 38.6 1.0
6. BT* United Kingdom 4,233.5 4,559.3 -7.1% 26.6 n.a.
7. Cable & Wireless United Kingdom 3,113.8 3,487.6 -10.7% 3.1 n.a.
8. Telefónica Spain 3,084.8 2,656.9 16.1% 27.6 2.8
9. Telecom Italia Italy 3,042.0 2,706.0 12.4% 28.0 n.a.
10. China Telecom China 2,600.0 2,240.0 16.1% 14.5 n.a.

* Data are for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2002. Telecom New Zealand’s fiscal year ends June 30, 2002.

Notes: Traffic figures are for public switched telephone network (PSTN) circuits and International Simple Resale only (service resale is excluded). Carrier rankings based on originating country minutes only; when based on the aggregated traffic of all subsidiaries, the top multinational carriers include: AT&T, BT, WorldCom, Cable & Wireless, Teleglobe, and Primus. International service revenues generally reflect net of PSTN service revenues after adding or subtracting for settlement payments but may also include some private line revenue. All revenue figures converted from original currency at conversion rate current to year end reported.

Source: TeleGeography research, FCC, and company reports.

Global Growth of International Carriers,
July 1996 - July 2002

Notes: Figures include all carriers authorized to provide international facilities-based service or international simple resale (ISR).

Source: TeleGeography research

 

International VoIP and PSTN Traffic Summary, 1997-2002

Notes: Voice-over-IP (VoIP) traffic includes all cross-border voice calls carried on IP networks but terminated on public switched telephone networks; PC-to-PC communications and private network traffic are excluded. PSTN traffic includes circuit-switched voice and fax traffic carried on traditional international facilities as well as international simple resale (ISR) facilities. Figures for 2002 are estimated.
Source: TeleGeography research

 

International VoIP and PSTN Traffic Destination Summary, 2001

Notes: Voice-over-IP (VoIP) traffic includes all cross-border voice calls carried on IP networks but terminated on public switched telephone networks; PC-to-PC communications and private network traffic are excluded. PSTN traffic includes circuit-switched voice and fax traffic carried on traditional international facilities as well as international simple resale (ISR) facilities.
Source: TeleGeography research

II.Internet

Top 10 International Internet Hub Cities, 2001

2001 Rank 2000 Rank City Country Countries Connected International Internet Bandwidth (Mbps) Interregional Share
1 1 London U.K. 61 237,389.2 36.0%
2 3 Paris France 48 179,064.8 12.6%
3 4 New York U.S. 71 173,098.6 86.7%
4 2 Amsterdam Netherlands 27 170,371.8 14.4%
5 5 Frankfurt Germany 28 160,459.0 5.8%
6 6 Brussels Belgium 17 76,246.4 1.0%
7 7 Stockholm Sweden 18 60,349.0 2.3%
8 20 Copenhagen Denmark 13 43,456.0 24.0%
9 17 Milan Italy 15 29,701.8 4.4%
10 9 Toronto Canada 6 24,942.3 0.1%

Note: Figures represent Internet bandwidth connected across international borders to each Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas or equivalent. Domestic routes are omitted. Data as of mid-2001.

Source: TeleGeography research

Interregional Internet Bandwidth, 2002

Interregional Internet Bandwidth

Notes: Figure represents Internet bandwidth connected across international borders. Data as of mid-2002.
Source: TeleGeography research

Major Interregional Internet Routes, 2002

Major Interregional Internet Routes

Notes: Figure represents Internet bandwidth connected across international borders to Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas or equivalents. Intraregional and domestic routes are omitted. Data as of mid-2002.

Source: TeleGeography research

Top 30 U.S. Internet Routes, 2002

 Top 30 U.S. Internet Routes, 2002

Notes: Map includes the top 30 domestic U.S. Internet routes ranked by aggregate bandwidth connecting Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas or equivalents as of May 2002.

Sources: TeleGeography research

European Telecommunication Traffic Flows, 2001

Latin American Telecommunication Traffic Flows, 2001

Asian Telecommunication Traffic Flows, 2001

 

Bit-Minute Index for 170 Countries, 2001

Country Bit-Minute Index, 2001
Albania 0.02
Algeria n.a.
Andorra 0.81
Angola 0.06
Antigua & Barbuda n.a.
Argentina 5.08
Armenia 0.10
Aruba 0.03
Australia 2.09
Austria 7.68
Azerbaijan 0.06
Bahamas 0.27
Bahrain 0.06
Bangladesh 0.09
Barbados 0.22
Belarus 0.16
Belgium 27.05
Belize n.a.
Benin 0.07
Bhutan n.a.
Bolivia 0.61
Botswana n.a.
Brazil 4.29
Brunei 1.46
Bulgaria 0.64
Burkina Faso 0.07
Burundi 0.34
Cambodia 0.07
Cameroon 0.09
Canada 5.39
Cape Verde 0.07
Chad 0.18
Chile 3.28
China 0.85
Colombia 0.56
Comoros 0.23
Congo, Dem. Rep. n.a.
Costa Rica 0.26
Côte d'Ivoire 0.04
Croatia 0.33
Cuba 0.02
Cyprus 0.25
Czech Republic 14.05
Denmark 29.32
Dominica n.a.
Dominican Republic 0.05
Ecuador 0.40
Egypt 0.38
El Salvador 0.22
Eritrea 0.01
Estonia 3.24
Ethiopia 0.03
Fiji 0.12
Finland 9.22
France 22.43
Gabon 0.07
Gambia n.a.
Georgia 0.03
Germany 16.50
Ghana 0.04
Greece 0.79
Greenland 5.49
Grenada n.a.
Guatemala 0.77
Guinea 0.35
Guinea-Bissau n.a.
Guyana 0.07
Honduras n.a.
Hong Kong 1.60
Hungary 4.15
Iceland 1.78
India 0.67
Indonesia 0.49
Iran 0.11
Ireland 2.07
Israel n.a.
Italy 6.42
Jamaica 0.18
Japan 5.84
Jordan 0.22
Kazakhstan 0.07
Kenya 0.19
Korea, Rep. 3.36
Kuwait 0.20
Kyrgyzstan 0.15
Laos 0.35
Latvia 1.80
Lebanon 0.05
Lesotho n.a.
Libya n.a.
Lithuania n.a.
Luxembourg 2.20
Macau 0.38
Macedonia 0.05
Madagascar 0.29
Malawi n.a.
Malaysia 0.57
Maldives 0.60
Mali n.a.
Malta 0.87
Mauritania 0.07
Mauritius 0.18
Mexico 0.59
Moldova 0.20
Mongolia 0.62
Morocco 0.21
Mozambique 0.04
Myanmar 0.01
Namibia 0.06
Nepal 0.48
Netherlands 40.27
Netherlands Antilles 0.44
New Zealand 1.52
Nicaragua 0.38
Niger 0.08
Nigeria n.a.
Norway 22.68
Oman 0.16
Pakistan 0.28
Panama 0.75
Papua New Guinea 0.79
Paraguay 0.28
Peru 1.06
Philippines 0.45
Poland 1.32
Portugal 2.74
Qatar 0.22
Réunion n.a.
Romania 2.89
Russia 2.10
Rwanda 0.07
Saint Lucia n.a.
Saudi Arabia 0.15
Senegal 0.32
Seychelles n.a.
Sierra Leone n.a.
Singapore 1.04
Slovak Republic 18.36
Slovenia 2.34
South Africa 0.59
Spain 6.56
Sri Lanka 0.17
St. Kitts & Nevis n.a.
Sudan 0.03
Suriname 0.30
Swaziland 0.02
Sweden 22.11
Switzerland 9.00
Syria 0.01
Taiwan 2.95
Tajikistan 0.10
Tanzania 0.26
Thailand 1.01
Togo 0.07
Trinidad & Tobago 0.22
Tunisia n.a.
Turkey 0.47
Turkmenistan 0.09
Uganda 0.35
Ukraine 0.30
United Arab Emirates 0.35
United Kingdom 14.01
United States 6.80
Uruguay 2.10
Uzbekistan 0.01
Venezuela 0.91
Vietnam 0.33
Yemen n.a.
Yugoslavia 0.04
Zambia 0.10
Zimbabwe 0.06

Note: The Bit-Minute Index expresses the relationship between international Internet supply and demand, taking international telephone traffic as a proxy for demand.

Source: Telegeography research

III. Networks

Submarine Cable Capacity Trends by Route, 1998 - 2004

Submarine Cable Capacity Trends by Route, 1999 - 2005

Notes: Capacity figures denote lit, protected capacity at the end of the respective year. Projected capacity assumes cables with upgradeable capacity will increase total cable capacity 20 percent each year until fully upgradeable capacity is achieved. Intra-Asia capacity includes cables with landings in both Hong Kong and Japan. Trans-Pacific capacity excludes Southern Cross and PacRim East. Trans-Atlantic capacity excludes Atlantis-2. Cables retired prior to year-end 2003 excluded from Fully Upgraded capacity.

Source: TeleGeography research

 

Submarine Cable Capacity (Gbps)
  1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Fully Upgraded
Intra-Asia 16.1 41.1 66.1 826.1 1,106.1 3,637.1 6,440.1 30,591.1
Trans-Atlantic 83.0 168.0 537.4 1,862.4 2,682.4 3,729.1 4,775.8 12,322.4
Trans-Pacific 14.1 44.1 204.1 344.1 1,314.1 1,896.1 2,388.1 6,984.1
U.S.-Latin America 10.6 13.1 250.6 275.6 275.6 725.6 1,171.1 4,915.6
Europe-Africa-Asia 11.1 31.1 51.1 51.1 61.1 71.1 81.1 171.1

International Connectivity on Active Circuits by City, 2001

Note: See the "Demand" chapter in Terrestrial Bandwidth 2002 for detailed breakdown of city international circuit usage by Internet, voice, and other network bandwidth.

Source: TeleGeography research

IV.Pricing

STM-1/OC3 Annual Lease Prices on Major U.S.
and European Routes, 1st Quarter 2002

Notes: Points represent prices quoted in the first quarter of 2002.

Source: TeleGeography research

 design by kondrashov.ru  
 (C) 2001 Alexey Kondrashov